<XML><RECORDS><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>9337</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Cockshott,W.P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Michaelson,G.J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cottrell,A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2009</YEAR><TITLE>Cantor diagonalisation and planning</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Journal of Unconventional Computing</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>N/A</PUBLISHER><PAGES>:223-236</PAGES><ISBN>1548-7199</ISBN><LABEL>Cockshott:2009:9337</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Hypercomputing</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS<ABSTRACT>Murphy (2006) recently argued that one could use the diagonal argument of the number theorist Cantor to elucidate issues that arose in the socialist calculation debate of the 1930s. We will here argue that Murphy's argument has certain problems, both at the number-theoretic level and from the standpoint of economic realism.</ABSTRACT><URL>http://www.oldcitypublishing.com/IJUC/IJUC.html</URL></RECORD></RECORDS></XML>