Feedback from SSMS 2007

Participants' Feedback

Overall this has been a very successful SSMS thanks to everyone involved. We, as organisers, could only make sure that the infrastructure was there. The speakers delivered interesting and professional presentations. However, the participants made it a truely interactive and fun event.

The opininion about the organisation of the poster session was divided. While most people thought it was a great way of telling each other about their work, some thought it would have been better to have all posters up throughout the duration of the event rather than splitting it up into sessions.

Some people also suggested to encourage more interaction between the students and lecturers through PhD presentations, public brain-storming sessions, or hands-on demo and exercise sessions. These suggestions should definitely be taken onboard for next year's SSMS.

People would have preferred to have wireless access at the venue (although I think the atmosphere during the lectures was better without people checking their emails) and a higher quality accommodation. We thought it was better to keep registration fees low and to provide full-time catering at the lecture venue instead.

What did you like in SSMS 2007?
Which topics/lectures did you like?

This depended very much on the participant's own background. Some preferred the low-level processing side and others the high-level semantics side. There were equal preferences for audio processing and music retrieval, image and video retrieval, semantic retrieval & ontologies, etc. The two most popular lectures/lecturers were:

Which topics weren't covered?
Things you would change about SSMS 2007?
Any other comments or suggestions

Lecturers' Feedback

Please email us if you want to say anything!